Is Civil Disobedience Justifiable?North Cyprus Forums Homepage Join Cyprus44 Board | Already a member? Login
Popular Posts - List of popular topics discussed on our board.
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
No1Doyen

 Joined: 04/07/2008 Posts: 16617
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 16:57 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 1 of 7 in Discussion |
| We all know that civil disobedience is the deliberate disobeying of a law to advance a moral principle or change government policy. Civil disobedience is used as a way of drawing attention to the perceived injustice, for example by damage to property, non-payment of fines or taxes, obstruction of building work, and trespassing. It would seem that those who practice civil disobedience are willing to accept the consequences of their actions as a means of furthering their cause. However is it ever justifiable for protesters and activists to break the law for the sake of their cause? |
jimmyG

Joined: 14/08/2008 Posts: 900
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 17:33 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 2 of 7 in Discussion |
| Well it seems to work for the French!! |
Blackie

Joined: 20/12/2007 Posts: 129
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 17:35 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 3 of 7 in Discussion |
| A resounding yes, especially if the regime is a represive one. Breaking down the Berlin Wall was an illegal act in East Germany, Tinaman Square was illegal. Some issues are so big that if you are commited and are prepared for the consequences which might befall you they are morally justified. Even in non totalitarian states the end sometimes justifies the means, the riots in Copenhagen recently during the global warming sumit were necessary to bring home to the heads of state how people feel about a very important issue, even if in the end it did not achieve anything obvious other than highlighting the issue. |
Harold2555


 Joined: 19/04/2008 Posts: 1139
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 17:58 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 4 of 7 in Discussion |
| I am not sure if I can condone or accept violence as an appropriate form of civil disobedience in any but the most extreme circumstances but there is clearly a place for non violent civil disobedience, India's struggle for freedom being the most poignant if somewhat Hackneyed example. Harold |
No1Doyen

 Joined: 04/07/2008 Posts: 16617
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 18:01 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 5 of 7 in Discussion |
| What about the poor old suffragetes! That was organised civil disobedience. |
kibrissibel

Joined: 18/02/2008 Posts: 562
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 18:11 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 6 of 7 in Discussion |
| Look what happened with the poll tax riots. It was abolished shortly afterwards. It seems that no one takes notice of peaceful protests. It's only when people are forced to riot or resort to civil disobedience to make positive changes that the government seem to stand up and take notice. It's a sad example of not listening to the will of the people. |
Maz

Joined: 29/03/2009 Posts: 1924
Message Posted: 08/01/2010 18:40 | Join or Login to Reply | Message 7 of 7 in Discussion |
| Two of my favourite words 'Situational ethics! |
North Cyprus Forums Homepage
Join Cyprus44 Forums | Already a member? Login
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
|