Tony's not slept all weeek worrying about tomorrow's day of reakoning

IvorBankloan



Joined: 14/08/2009
Posts: 180

Message Posted:
28/01/2010 21:03

30,000 people applied for the 12 seats available at the hearing on Friday. with luck the hi-lights may be ion TV at the week end so please everyone watch and tell me if you can see his nose grow as he gives his answers. Some of you know that my recent years have been spent in thre Middle East but none of you know just how many genuine Muslim frieds I have accumulated.

During lengthy conversations with many of them about our differences it became obvious that as far as religion goes our beliefes are not that far apart. Why are we killing each other?

It became obvious that family values on their side are stronger thn our own so who's out of step there?

Muslim banking cannot make profit from lendning money. How good would that be in UK?

Regardless of what they tell you or what you believe some do drink, and enjoy it. Whats wrong with that?

The list of questions goes on in a similar manner but the one that sticks out is

Who has the oil?

Lilli



Joined: 21/07/2008
Posts: 13081

Message Posted:
28/01/2010 21:06

Ivor we wait with baited breath for more lies. but then he can get a good barrister. They close ranks look how they are covering up the Kelly death for 70 years

cyprusishome


Joined: 31/03/2007
Posts: 2381

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 08:00

Let us see if Teflon Man is still smiling by the end of today.



If he is then we know there will be a cover up!

No1Doyen


Joined: 04/07/2008
Posts: 16617

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 09:20

It's his day of reckoning. Lets hope he tells the truth.

simbas



Joined: 16/07/2007
Posts: 5943

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 09:23

I won't hold my breath !

Simbas

Whistler


Joined: 28/07/2008
Posts: 1332

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 09:50

Please can someone tell me what hearing ? Sorry if I`m missing something.

No1Doyen


Joined: 04/07/2008
Posts: 16617

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 10:30

Here, read this.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8485694.stm

Whistler


Joined: 28/07/2008
Posts: 1332

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 10:40

Thanks No.1. I re-read the heading and realised it was Tony Blair, haven`t been watching the world news much.

deecyprus4


Joined: 27/07/2008
Posts: 3452

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 11:46

Tony Blair is far too arrogant to lose sleep over those he thinks he is superior to.

Corbo



Joined: 13/09/2009
Posts: 627

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 12:50

I'm watching Blair live now as it's too cold and wet to do much outside and he seems to be basing most of the Iraq intervention on 9/11. But Saddam had nothing to do with that. Blair says that they would have killed 30,000 in that attack if they could and he's right on that but are these attacks now more likely due to the Iraq war? Saddam ran a nasty fascistic regime but a fairly controlled secular one. I would suggest that many more intolerant fundamentalist have come into the frame in Iraq since Saddam was ousted. Blair seems to be on some mission from God himself; but whose God?

MsGarnet


Joined: 04/01/2009
Posts: 989

Message Posted:
29/01/2010 13:27

Remember this nefarious mendacious machievellian two faced liar NEVER takes responsibility for anything, any more than his 'divided at birth' twin Bush ever did - EVERYTHING was down to their Deity - who made decisions for them, as they are both mindless cretinous morons - ergo, no need then to be burdened with any pesky moral compass, values, standards or principles.



I will NEVER understand how either of these two aren't in prison awaiting trial at the International Court of the Hague as War Criminals.......unconscionable........

IvorBankloan



Joined: 14/08/2009
Posts: 180

Message Posted:
30/01/2010 14:49

I watched it on TV, you have to hand it to him he is good. I bet he could sell double glazing to pensuoners without blinking.



Apart from I noticed hs nose growing all the way thru the inquest, I think he did have a point. not a very stong one but a point. If we'd pulled out after emabrrassing Sadam would he have coemn back with retaliation or not? woul dhe have done that by funding terrorists? Who knows?



I agree that Sadam needed to be removed but not at the cost of 100,000 lives and Billions in costs to the people of UK. We and the Amaricans should had a covert operation leading to blasting Sadam and his team of murders using the now well publicised remote control bombers. We know where ttey all are at any time and teams operating these unmanned flights often blast terrorists in the midst of planting bombs so why could we wait and blast them the same way without losing 100,000 iives?