North Cyprus Tourist Board - orams case settlement
North Cyprus
North Cyprus > North Cyprus Forum > orams case settlement

orams case settlement

North Cyprus Forums Homepage

Join Cyprus44 Board | Already a member? Login

Popular Posts - List of popular topics discussed on our board.

You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.

» See All North Cyprus Lawyer Discussions posted so far

» Law Firms on Cyprus44 Business Directory

» Read about Orams Case Land Dispute Judgement

» North Cyprus Title Deeds

» Is It Safe to Buy in Northern Cyprus?



yorgozlu



Joined: 16/06/2009
Posts: 4437

Message Posted:
05/07/2010 01:04

Join or Login to Reply
Message 1 of 5 in Discussion

http://www.kibrisgazetesi.com/popup.php/cat/3/news/96914/PageName/Guney_Kibris



It is in Turkish,but what it basicaly says is that,they had paid £675000 and £75000 is towards the court cost+it is not all of it yet.



wanderer


Joined: 05/02/2009
Posts: 1653

Message Posted:
05/07/2010 07:50

Join or Login to Reply
Message 2 of 5 in Discussion

Orams couple of the British, the British Court of Appeal is expected to be paid as compensation for Meletis Apsotolidis'e a portion of the claim was paid.

Politis newspaper, Lapta'da land to build their villas in the grounds of the Orams couple instituted proceedings against the Cypriot

Meletis plead until Apostolidis'in Konstantis Kandunas'ın based description, the Orams couple, the account of clients, has invested 675 thousand pounds, "the 75 thousand to pay for litigation costs represent the amount that" was written.

According to the news, Kandunas, said in a statement, they were delighted because of the amount of the deposit, payment of compensation is determined that they are sure said.

Newspaper, the deposit, was written do not constitute all of the compensation.

According to the news, Kandunas, these villas are not destroyed, and returned real estate, decided to take forward the review procedure for disobedience was what they said



wanderer


Joined: 05/02/2009
Posts: 1653

Message Posted:
05/07/2010 07:54

Join or Login to Reply
Message 3 of 5 in Discussion

Sal

thanks for that

I do love google translate it really murders a language

looks as if they want it demolished if the last paragraph has translated correctly so more back to court

Will the judge realise that this is a veracious and malicious action I doubt it !

What's happened about their claim for an unfair initial trial



elko2



Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400

Message Posted:
05/07/2010 08:29

Join or Login to Reply
Message 4 of 5 in Discussion

The heading of this thread is misleading. It says that according to Politis newspaper based on the announcement of the lawyer of Apostoledis, 675,000 pounds has been paid into the account of Apostolides by Orams towards the cost of the compensation which is not all and 75 pounds for the costs. furthermore, his lawyer is looking into the fact that the villa has not been demolished yet and thus thge disobidience of the court order (of ROC) continues for furtherr possible action.

My comment: the kangaroo court in ROC ordered Orams to pay compensation toApostolides for loss of use of the land for so long plus ordered Orams to demolish the villa and hand back the land as they found it. Of course a lot of water has past under the bridge since that decision like the consecutive ECHR decisions which made Orams decisionb a hollow victory.

ismet



yorgozlu



Joined: 16/06/2009
Posts: 4437

Message Posted:
05/07/2010 11:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 5 of 5 in Discussion

It is a shame ECHR decesion did not come before Orams case,though like you say Ismet abi,it makes the decesion of Orams case POINTLESS.



As for demolishing the house,thats downt to TRNC courts not kangaroo as you nicely put it Ismet abi.



North Cyprus Forums Homepage

Join Cyprus44 Forums | Already a member? Login

You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.