Beware challenging others views on this forum

Hector


Joined: 26/08/2008
Posts: 2352

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 18:57

I now realise why there are a lot more people who read the posts than post. I have been challenging on this forum the attitude of some members towards the police over the death of Raul Moat. In response I have now started receiving invitations from gay porn etc websites.

jimmykibris


Joined: 20/07/2010
Posts: 151

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 19:03

is this since only since you challenged the police version on the death of Raul Moat. ??

simbas



Joined: 16/07/2007
Posts: 5943

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 19:07

Wow , i would'nt have thought 44 would be of any such interest

Simbas

wynyardman



Joined: 15/12/2007
Posts: 4580

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 19:41

Hector,



Dont look at me. I,m straight.!! I do have opinions on the death of Roul Moat though!!



wyn

Hector


Joined: 26/08/2008
Posts: 2352

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 19:54

message 2 - Yes it is.

Message 4 - your sexuality is not of interest to me. Your opinions are.



Sad that someone doesn't like it that I challenged anti police postings.

No1Doyen


Joined: 04/07/2008
Posts: 16617

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 19:59

It is sad Hector. Looks like you must have hit a nerve though.

wynyardman



Joined: 15/12/2007
Posts: 4580

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 20:17

I have never posted anti police rhetoric. I have pleaded for more openness. I have asked why Moats letters and recordings have not been made public and subjected to professional analysis. I have questioned some of the known facts. I have said that in my opinion we have much more to learn.



I have complained bitterly over the the cheque book journalism that has followed this story Paying vast sums of money to everyone who claimed to have a story. in order create sensationalism, and in the process suppress the truth.



You say you are interested in my opinions (dont ask me why?) These Hector are my opinions, not anti police rhetoric

In the interests of truth, lets stick to the facts.



wyn

catalkoykid


Joined: 15/02/2009
Posts: 1190

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 20:19

wyn i think hes attention seeking lol

Jetski


Joined: 21/07/2008
Posts: 584

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 20:40

Hector - you're spot on. There's a huge number of 'lurkers' on this forum, many of whom I'm sure have valid points to raise but haven't the guts to stick their heads over the parapet. There's also those of course who will post some trite nonsense in order to 'raise their profile'.



The Moate thing has been most unfortunate - the police and social services in the UK have much to answer for in this case - but it is just one case.

Tatlisu4me


Joined: 26/01/2008
Posts: 436

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 21:11

Hector its not me ! (Always respected you and No 1 Doyan, good posters) !

zerochlor


Joined: 03/04/2009
Posts: 4024

Message Posted:
20/07/2010 21:52

Hector!



come on,spill the beans,tell us who you think is spamming you !





Post edited under Rule 3.

rowlo



Joined: 12/10/2008
Posts: 4796

Message Posted:
21/07/2010 10:59

hector, why dont you remove your email address if you think the spam is coming via the forum ?

keithcaley



Joined: 13/06/2008
Posts: 2521

Message Posted:
21/07/2010 11:13

rowlo,

A whiff of 'closing the stable door after the horse has bolted' - don't you think?

If Hector's email address has been circulated to Porn distributors, and is now in their address book, then removing it from the Forum will make no difference at all.

My email address has been 'in the Public Domain' for years now, and I simply rely on an efficient 'spam filter' to chuck it all in the trash can - if you're not prepared to risk getting spam, then you need to keep your email address a closely guarded secret - although you'll never get ANY email

I got an email the other day, offering a fool-proof method of enlarging my breasts; - I looked in the mirror and decided that a REDUCTION might be more appropriate - I did consider passing it on to Vaughan though...

TRNCVaughan


Joined: 27/04/2008
Posts: 4578

Message Posted:
21/07/2010 11:31

You've been peeking, you cheeky boy!