!!!Jet Fuel for Isreal!!!

gillken


Joined: 25/05/2008
Posts: 521

Message Posted:
28/08/2010 22:58

http://lataan.blogspot.com/2010/08/israel-orders-massive-military-fuel.html

Lilli



Joined: 21/07/2008
Posts: 13081

Message Posted:
28/08/2010 23:08

Frightening thoughs, did you read the comments. x

andre 514


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 1163

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 13:00

everyone agrees lilli that poor civilians may get caught up in a future conflict

however this "palestinian" blog spot may have good reasons to big up the chances



firstly it may be that iran's agent hisbollla is now itself planning lebanon war III,

supposedly having delivery of new and bigger rockets designed to hit civilians



secondly if true, the "supplies" may simply be precautionary to cover all eventualities



thirdly, if the israeli airforce gives iran a healthy slap it should really surprise no-one:

unlike some naiive americans, the israelis can be under no illusion they would hurt

the ayatollahs' score of secret atomic factories which are mostly far underground

...but ahmenadinajad's backers would appreciate what would happen

if they carried out his threat to attack israel with a-bombs, something you'd not condone



and "what if"?



vast damage to iran's infrastructure, a smallish number of casualties, sunni arab joy

and catawauling from eurolefties



andre

Groucho



Joined: 26/04/2008
Posts: 7993

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 13:07

Maybe they think the price point is advantageous.... and it's nothing more sinister than that.

Rogerdodger


Joined: 24/04/2008
Posts: 271

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 16:24

Go, Israel,



IRAN will kick off the next world war by having the capability to manufacture nuclear devises and selling them to some tin pot dictator to use, or even using them themselves, then draw the rest of the world in to the same mess.



IRAN needs to either stop making this stuff or be stopped, they say it is for domestic use, "my A**E"



My personal thoughts!

glw215


Joined: 02/04/2008
Posts: 178

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 17:01

I wonder do the Israelis have nuclear weapons?

I know that Israel along with North Korea have refused to sign the Nuclear non-proliferation treaty (Iran has signed) and I wonder why not.

I know that Mordechai Vanunu a former Israeli Nuclear technician produced solid evidence that the Israelis did have nuclear weapons (as far back as 1986). Vanunu was however immediately kidnapped by the Israelis in Italy and jailed for 18 years so we are still left 'wondering' .

ang1706


Joined: 28/01/2009
Posts: 570

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 17:09

If this is true, then all the so called Military Genuisis have dreampt it possible.

But its obvious that Syria, Egypt and Jordan have done a deal with the US as can see Israel bombing Iran, attacking Hamas in Gaza as a blockade measure but main thrust coming into southern Lebanon after Hezbollah, this as a repeat of 6 day war of 1967, however will last a lot longer.

Gaza and bombing of Iran will be easy as when the Iranians see the destruction caused they will be not so full of war!

However invading Lebanon might not be so difficult as people seem as there is only a small area to attack through and I believe that the Israelis would be upto Beirut within a few days again.

So all this fuel is for one purpose- WAR !!



Whose supplying it , yes those wonderful peacemakers the US, coincidentally just as they are holding peace talks next month- obviously to strengthen Israels hand !!



Watch this tragic space !!

andre 514


Joined: 31/03/2008
Posts: 1163

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 20:54

message 7:



the only tragedy in your somewhat garbled message,

is making things seem far more complex than they are



if iran gets a warning pasting it will hardly surprise anyone

and cheer very many sunnis in the arab world



not that I am either "for" nor "against" such an eventuality

any more than I am for or against what some call a solution

for cyprus, whatever that rather vague label actually means



andre

Lilli



Joined: 21/07/2008
Posts: 13081

Message Posted:
29/08/2010 20:58

I thought that i saw on tv last week that Iran had just laucnched its trial nuclear rocket.

yrret


Joined: 17/08/2010
Posts: 761

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 10:26

Msg 6: I wonder do the Israelis have nuclear weapons?



Yes, and yes they will be used if need be.

malsancak


Joined: 23/08/2009
Posts: 2874

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 10:33

I'd worry more about North Korea, they have nuclear bombs and China's support

keldanreb


Joined: 17/09/2009
Posts: 212

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 10:50

the world is worried

Crumpy



Joined: 05/06/2010
Posts: 419

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 10:53

Re ; msg 11 - Malsancak wrote "I'd worry more about North Korea, they have nuclear bombs and China's support"



I'd worry more about the US - they have nuclear bombs and don't feel they need anyone's support.

Groucho



Joined: 26/04/2008
Posts: 7993

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 12:06

The only country to have used them too....

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 12:46

I feel that Israel has no choice but to go in. It can't afford to allow Iran to develop a destructive weapon, because, there is every possibility that it would use it on Israel. The way that the Iranian government treats it's opponent,the way it deals with dissenters and the way it punishes those that transgress it's archaic rules, shows that it is not a progressive government, but one that is regressive. It may not be unreasonable to compare it with a society from the middle ages.



msge 13



I do not worry about the US using it's nuclear weapons. Yes, the US is on a mission to spread it's version of democracy and laissez faire capitalism, and it can be aggressive in it's implementation, but it has no intention of using it's nuclear arsenal.

Perhaps, things could change if Palin gets in.

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 12:48

Msge 14



The US faced the prospect of losing allot of its soldiers in invading Japan.



Japan was not going to surrender, so, many more people probably would have died, than those who died from the atom bombs, as bad as it was.



After the war, America sent over it’s very best minds to ensure that Japan could develop a strong economy and not start another war. It can be argued that America did a better job with Japan than it’s own country. America laid the roots of ‘Kaizen’ which has made Japan an industrial powerhouse and a highly stable country. America did a fine job here

TRNCVaughan


Joined: 27/04/2008
Posts: 4578

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 12:52

Americas nuclear arsenal will ensure no-one butts-in when it starts to wipe the floor with Iran. Remember - Iranians may be moslems but they aren't Arabs and they have few alies in the region.

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 12:55

msge 17



spot on



this is why the Israelis will go in

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 13:45

I wonder what would have happened if the US and Britain had held it's nerve in the Korean war. If the US had dug in, North Korea now united with the South would be an economic powerhouse not a pariah state.



I don't know much about this war, perhaps, it was too dangerous to risk a head on collision with China.

TRNCVaughan


Joined: 27/04/2008
Posts: 4578

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 14:15

N.Korea has Mao Tse Tung to thank for the shit order it now finds itself in.

Since Mao snuffed it, China has seen the light.

N. Korea is still in the dark.

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 14:27

the rumour is that China does not want North Korea to unite with the South. Both countries united, would be quite a serious threat to China's economic dominance of the region.

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 14:27

apologies, we have digressed from the main topic

Crumpy



Joined: 05/06/2010
Posts: 419

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 15:04

Re ; message 22



IloveCyprus,



Discussing the US's approach to foreign policy is not so much of a digression from the topic of this thread - Powerful US-based Jewish lobby groups will ensure that the approaches of both countries in the middle east are intrinsically linked.



And with regard to your "Japan was not going to surrender" comment in message 16 - Don't you feel the US could have waited a little more than three days, before they dropped the second on Nagasaki? - Japan was still trying to comprehend what had hit them. Hopefully, Israel doesn't behave in the same way ...

ilovecyprus


Joined: 08/05/2007
Posts: 2880

Message Posted:
30/08/2010 15:19

msge 23



"Don't you feel the US could have waited a little more than three days, before they dropped the second on Nagasaki?"



Yes