ECHR decides Turkey should pay 13 miln. eurosNorth Cyprus Forums Homepage Join Cyprus44 Board | Already a member? Login
Popular Posts - List of popular topics discussed on our board.
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
Tenakoutou
Joined: 27/07/2009
Posts: 4110
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 10:47 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 3 of 21 in Discussion |
| You can only poke a sleeping giant so many times............ before you get stomped on!!! |
apc2010
Joined: 28/07/2010
Posts: 1689
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 10:50 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 4 of 21 in Discussion |
| the giant is ,,,,the echr or turkey ..???? |
martinD41
Joined: 06/09/2010
Posts: 3001
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 10:51 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 5 of 21 in Discussion |
| Now watch Turkey bite back...and turn their back on the EU....... |
apc2010
Joined: 28/07/2010
Posts: 1689
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 10:54 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 6 of 21 in Discussion |
| do you think they will pay....?????
martin, they are still un members ??? |
martinD41
Joined: 06/09/2010
Posts: 3001
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 11:17 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 7 of 21 in Discussion |
| msg 6 I Hope not.......
Turkey is already looking East for trade it doesn't need the EU...........It will still remain a UN member |
breezyboy
Joined: 14/05/2007
Posts: 1179
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 12:02 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 8 of 21 in Discussion |
| More to the point they are NATO members and NATO need the bases in Turkey, so a V sign in the direction of Brussels or Strasbourg should do the trick.I would be quite happy to be annexed to Turkey and get rid of the amateurs making a balls of running, sorry pretending to run, TRNC. |
martinD41
Joined: 06/09/2010
Posts: 3001
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 12:49 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 9 of 21 in Discussion |
| msg8. The V sign should do it ..They can't pay the fine,it could be construed as an apology to the Greek Cypriots............ |
ajaney
Joined: 24/12/2008
Posts: 199
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 13:18 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 10 of 21 in Discussion |
| Sorry. I am confused - I thought the echr had referred all claims to the IOC so can anyone explain how this has come about? |
Harold2555
Joined: 19/04/2008
Posts: 1139
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 13:23 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 11 of 21 in Discussion |
| Ajaney
These 19 cases were approved for Juristiction in the ECHR before the court ruled that the IPC was the appropriate local remedy to be sought.
there is another big case coming with regards to a businessman and his Land in Varosha due on 2nd November.
All new claims have to go to the IPC route before the ECHR would even consider them.
Harold |
Harold2555
Joined: 19/04/2008
Posts: 1139
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 13:32 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 12 of 21 in Discussion |
| Turkey's agreement to be bound by the ECHR is seperate from their application to the EU for membership. they could I suppose reverse their decision but I think it unlikely.
Harold |
martinD41
Joined: 06/09/2010
Posts: 3001
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 13:35 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 13 of 21 in Discussion |
| So Harold ,do you think they will pay? |
elko2
Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 14:03 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 14 of 21 in Discussion |
| I think Turkey made a secret deal with ECHR and thus got the recognition for IPC. These cases they are ruling now were accepted before the IPC. So not so many in the pipe. turkey will pay it after making some noises.
ismet |
caulkhead
Joined: 03/01/2009
Posts: 149
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 14:33 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 15 of 21 in Discussion |
| Ismet wise as ever. |
mmmmmm
Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 16:32 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 16 of 21 in Discussion |
| ECHR is part of the Council of Europe .... Turkey is a paid up member..
NOTHING to do with the EU....
sighs.. think I've pointed this out only 10 times, or so, on here !! |
apc2010
Joined: 28/07/2010
Posts: 1689
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 18:44 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 18 of 21 in Discussion |
| Rock Ruby hotel application said, "[i]The rent claimed was for the period dating back to January 1990 until 1 January 2003. The applicant did not claim compensation for any purported expropriation since it was still the legal owner of the property"[/i] So it looks as if the compensation was not for the property itself but loss of use etc. |
Troodo
Joined: 12/06/2008
Posts: 1002
Message Posted:
27/10/2010 19:04 | | Join or Login to Reply | Message 19 of 21 in Discussion |
| Why do they not say they will look at these exaggerated claims fairly, after a solution is found? Surely, I have heard that somewhere before - from the GC side I believe. |
North Cyprus Forums Homepage
Join Cyprus44 Forums | Already a member? Login
You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.
|
