Ismet court case... update

stevo-london


Joined: 23/10/2010
Posts: 253

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 15:05

Have been reading how ismet has got the courts here pushed into a corner and am looking forward to an update today on how he has got along

flightholiday


Joined: 19/07/2007
Posts: 3217

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 15:17

Likewise - Ismet we are routing for you! Go in and win

flightholiday


Joined: 19/07/2007
Posts: 3217

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 15:23

Speed Cameras see the original thread at http://www.cyprus44.com/forums/55436.asp

No1Doyen


Joined: 04/07/2008
Posts: 16617

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 15:27

Ismet will eat the courts alive. )

stevo-london


Joined: 23/10/2010
Posts: 253

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 15:30

Hope he will, come on ismet wish I had a chance to go down there and see what happend lol al fun and games...

elko2



Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 16:08

ok see the original case for an update and please let this one slip back. http://www.cyprus44.com/forums/55436.asp

ismet

Sundance


Joined: 15/07/2010
Posts: 213

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 16:16

hi Ismet good luck in court.



Sundance

mmmmmm



Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 16:34

Hi Izzie,



I, too, await to see the outcome of your ( eventual) defence !

elko2



Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 18:55

Marky, do you know if they prosecute people for speeding in UK with photos taken from the back and the driver not shown on it? Do they presume that the owner of the vehicle is the driver?

ismet

DoctorW


Joined: 28/11/2010
Posts: 334

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 19:04

In UK the registered owner is prosecuted for any offence unless they disclose who was driving at the time. A notice of prosecution is sent to the registered owner and they need to inform the prosecution service who was driver was. If they do not do so they will be prosecuted. Company Directors have been known to take the fine/points if they are unable to trace the driver at the time. So in reality it doesnt really matter whether your face is showing on the photograph. Most cameras in UK now take photographs of the rear of vehicles otherwise motorcyclists would get away scott free

DoctorW


Joined: 28/11/2010
Posts: 334

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 19:06

Sorry last one should have said registered keeper, as the registered keeper may not be the owner.

fosterscan


Joined: 27/02/2010
Posts: 541

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 19:19

doctorw it is against the law to take the fine or points if you were not drivein ,if the photo does not prove with out doubt and you can show you have made an effort to find who was drivein case will be dismissed.

Harold2555



Joined: 19/04/2008
Posts: 1139

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 20:22

There is a legal requirement for Company vehicles to keep a log of who is driving vehicles at any particular time. Failing to do so is punished quite severely. The same law does not apply to individuals in the UK





Harold

Zoots


Joined: 05/02/2011
Posts: 669

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 22:19

Bet a few husbands and wives take the rap for each other. And you can bet a huge amount of money changes hands among people wanting to avoid a ban and someone happy to oblige and take the rap!

If the price is right...

YFred


Joined: 06/05/2009
Posts: 1471

Message Posted:
21/03/2011 22:34

The Hamiltons claimed they could not remember who was driving on the night in question. They did not want to lie to the court saying one or the other and got away with it.