North Cyprus Tourist Board - PETITION (by one): Grant an amnesty for all the C44 banned-for-lifers
North Cyprus
North Cyprus > North Cyprus Forum > PETITION (by one): Grant an amnesty for all the C44 banned-for-lifers

PETITION (by one): Grant an amnesty for all the C44 banned-for-lifers

North Cyprus Forums Homepage

Join Cyprus44 Board | Already a member? Login

Popular Posts - List of popular topics discussed on our board.

You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:01

Join or Login to Reply
Message 1 of 116 in Discussion

I'm told by one of the banned-for-lifers that board manager Izzet Zorlu leaves it to the moderators whether to lift such a ban or not.

▶ I petition the moderators to consider such an amnesty for all life long banned people on this board, who could be re-installed in their membership under the banned nickname.

Reasons for my request:

1 : Freedom of speech - within the board rules - must be must remain the major rule on this board.

2 : There would be no more reasons for double or triple ID's on this board - which is a confusing and annoying situation for new and old C44 members.



Let's see if it works - banning again is easy enough, although hopefully not necessary.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:02

Join or Login to Reply
Message 2 of 116 in Discussion

Could Zero come back?



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:04

Join or Login to Reply
Message 3 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 2, philbailey: Please read this line (maybe again):

▶ I petition the moderators to consider such an amnesty for all life long banned people on this board, who could be re-installed in their membership under the banned nickname.

ALL.



Clarissa2


Joined: 12/06/2009
Posts: 1476

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:07

Join or Login to Reply
Message 4 of 116 in Discussion

Re : Msg 1,

I concur.

Re : Msg 2,

Ask 0-manda et al.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:07

Join or Login to Reply
Message 5 of 116 in Discussion

It was tongue in cheek

should have explained , sorry



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:26

Join or Login to Reply
Message 6 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 5, philbailey: Never mind, it must be my obvious lack of the world famous (in the UK...) British sense of humour. The reason may be that Holland was never influenced by British occupiers. Usurpers Spain, France, Germany - they left their traces, including "humour".

The only Englishman who tried to rule "The Republic of the Seven United Netherlands" was the Earl of Leicester, Queen Elisabeth's favourite if I remember well - but his humour (hanging some unruly Netherlanders) and his military 'help' was almost fatal for Hollands forebear during the 80 Year War against Spain.

I hope you now understand why Britishers and I are different...

Back on topic.



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:35

Join or Login to Reply
Message 7 of 116 in Discussion

Well DC. i must commend you on the most sensible post ever on cyprus44,it does make sense what you are saying,as im tired of defending david or talking for him,but of course i shall carry on if need be.



@ least if he has his posting name back i wont be accused of being him,or him being me.



Now here is a question for all,do any of you actually know why zero was banned,because im sure it was not really anything to do with the board as such,and if any mod says it was,would they like to show the facts,or was it more of a clash of personalities in direct emails back and forth from zero and the mods and david speaking his mind in emails,which in my mind has nothing to do with the board.



Anyway,lets hope that a posative sensable conclusion can come of this post of your DC.



And i know my spelling is not great,but as david says,i can count!



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 12:50

Join or Login to Reply
Message 8 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 7, 0-m: Maybe, if we are all aiming at the moderators for a fresh start, it would be better if we don't refresh old memories in this thread. In my opinion in this case email is a better option.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 13:03

Join or Login to Reply
Message 9 of 116 in Discussion

Almost 100 views, but very few pro or con replies. A bit disappointing. It would certainly help the intention of msg 1 if more people would post in this thread. Thank you.



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 13:09

Join or Login to Reply
Message 10 of 116 in Discussion

Agreed message 8



There has been many emails im told in the last month to moderators and also to izzet,izzets automatic reply is ,sorry im too busy these days for cyprus 44, if your message is important,please address it to the moderators,im told maybe 8 or 9 emails have been sent back and forth to mods.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 13:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 11 of 116 in Discussion

Bring back zoots

and roomy



DoctorW


Joined: 28/11/2010
Posts: 334

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 13:48

Join or Login to Reply
Message 12 of 116 in Discussion

Dont have any problem with rescinding the bans but I dont think it would change anything about double or triple id's. How about if the banned members write to moderators giving all their multiple id's and passwords. The passwords can then be changed by moderators to something unrecoverable and the multiple id's would then be unusable. This would at least show that the banned person is willing to abide by the rules. Then we could have a post which tells us of all the rescinded id's, without mentioning names or original id's or alternatively they could be laid quietly to rest.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 17:33

Join or Login to Reply
Message 13 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 12, DoctorW: Your post makes sense. Good suggestion.



Pugwash


Joined: 06/09/2010
Posts: 1797

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 17:35

Join or Login to Reply
Message 14 of 116 in Discussion

Yes it does but there are certain members who would not give them all up or maybe just make new ones, not sure how you can control that.



araneae


Joined: 24/06/2011
Posts: 193

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 17:48

Join or Login to Reply
Message 15 of 116 in Discussion

many many users have double /tripple user names this is ignored by the mods to a degree .



The idea mooted by d/c is commendable, I would think if the perceived offenders agree not to participate in the actions that led to the ban and agreed not to post under any other user name they may have this could be a way forward.



jimmyG


Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 900

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 17:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 16 of 116 in Discussion

Totally agree with your proposition Hans.



Tootie


Joined: 28/08/2008
Posts: 2037

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:08

Join or Login to Reply
Message 17 of 116 in Discussion

I also agree with Dutch's proposition.

Although I quote from msg 1...

"I'm told by one of the banned-for-lifers that board manager Izzet Zorlu leaves it to the moderators whether to lift such a ban or not."



So who are the moderator(s) that "actively" moderate the board at present? Excluding: Simbas & Harold



Just for a refresh, http://www.cyprus44.com/forums/7799.asp



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:19

Join or Login to Reply
Message 18 of 116 in Discussion

I agree with Dutch -Crusader proposal,



Please reinstate all banned life time members....



Dizzycows ......



fiendishpaul


Joined: 18/05/2008
Posts: 1720

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:25

Join or Login to Reply
Message 19 of 116 in Discussion

Yep, I agree. It would seem that banning someone has limited effect as they seem to reappear almost instantly (in one form or another )



araneae


Joined: 24/06/2011
Posts: 193

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:30

Join or Login to Reply
Message 20 of 116 in Discussion

because thet can and feel the ban is /was unjustified perhaps , full credit to mods for their consideration on this matter we say.



joandjelly


Joined: 24/02/2008
Posts: 2953

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 21 of 116 in Discussion

I agree too.



mmmmmm



Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:36

Join or Login to Reply
Message 22 of 116 in Discussion

Good idea, DC



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 18:54

Join or Login to Reply
Message 23 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 14, Pugwash: (...) Yes it does but there are certain members who would not give them all up or maybe just make new ones, not sure how you can control that. (...)

▶ Let's start with the benefit of the doubt - the rest is for later imo.



mikelapta



Joined: 20/11/2008
Posts: 2186

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 19:07

Join or Login to Reply
Message 24 of 116 in Discussion

I agree with you,DC.Possibly the answer to "double/treble etc "indentifications,if they trespass again,then it is an automatic ban...maybe not for life but eg a year.

and then......another transgression...life !!!!



Perhaps we can be enlightened who is suffering a "life ban " at present.



I know some who have deserved it !!!!!



medoc


Joined: 05/09/2010
Posts: 84

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 19:29

Join or Login to Reply
Message 25 of 116 in Discussion

I agree, too.



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 19:50

Join or Login to Reply
Message 26 of 116 in Discussion

Hans

Would you kindly remind us as to which members are still banned for life.



sienna


Joined: 09/01/2009
Posts: 1627

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 19:57

Join or Login to Reply
Message 27 of 116 in Discussion

I disagree it will start all over again ) tin hat on





.......... remember we are all entitled to our opinion



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 19:58

Join or Login to Reply
Message 28 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 26, AJ: (...) Would you kindly remind us as to which members are still banned for life. (...)

▶ I can't give a full list but I suppose that the (ex-)moderators can or should be able to complete this (names at the time they were banned): Zerochlor, Littlenige, Private Pike.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:01

Join or Login to Reply
Message 29 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 27, sienna: (...) I disagree it will start all over again ) tin hat on (...)

▶ That may be so, but C44 won't be any worse than now if we try - I think.



spider


Joined: 03/01/2009
Posts: 5527

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:03

Join or Login to Reply
Message 30 of 116 in Discussion

Thats a good idea AJ or failing that the ones banned but are still using the board please step forward and come clean....All will be forgiven easy !



Go on be blooming brave enough





Good thread Hans lets hope it works.



Spider,X



Clarissa2


Joined: 12/06/2009
Posts: 1476

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:08

Join or Login to Reply
Message 31 of 116 in Discussion

Re : Msg 29,

"▶ That may be so, but C44 won't be any worse than now ..."



Indeed, it is impossible to be worse...



sienna


Joined: 09/01/2009
Posts: 1627

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:10

Join or Login to Reply
Message 32 of 116 in Discussion

@ 29 you think , well if it happens I will remind you of this thread, bad idea



Why do you want them back? - you of all people IMO are less tolerant than most - this idea surprises me so all the good moderation has gone to waste



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:20

Join or Login to Reply
Message 33 of 116 in Discussion

You forgot APC.



hmmm.theres more,but i cant remember,denizen,her uncle,i forget his name.



Brinsley


Joined: 04/04/2009
Posts: 6858

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:23

Join or Login to Reply
Message 34 of 116 in Discussion

Msg 33

Om, Tony!



Richard



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:26

Join or Login to Reply
Message 35 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 32, sienna: (...) Why do you want them back? - you of all people IMO are less tolerant than most - this idea surprises me so all the good moderation has gone to waste (...)

▶ This thread is not about me nor my style of writing. Feel free to teach me lessons in any thread you want. Or send me email if you can't live with - in your opinion - my intolerance. I always reply to any email.

In this thread I only try to normalise the C44 environment, which in my opinion has become sick - see my msg 1.

Back on topic, please.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:29

Join or Login to Reply
Message 36 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 33 & 34: Right. The list (complete now?): Zerochlor, Littlenige, Private Pike, APC, Tony.



Tootie


Joined: 28/08/2008
Posts: 2037

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 37 of 116 in Discussion

Dont forget pollymarples aka misunderstood.

Never did get the botttom of that one, did we?



vonny


Joined: 25/06/2009
Posts: 476

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:34

Join or Login to Reply
Message 38 of 116 in Discussion

i have no problem with banned members coming back,but maybe the mods are scared that some of them may double their work if they start playing up again, maybe they should lift the ban but enrole more mods.



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:34

Join or Login to Reply
Message 39 of 116 in Discussion

DC , britvic, and there are a couple of others that were banned for stupid reasons....



Tootie


Joined: 28/08/2008
Posts: 2037

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:35

Join or Login to Reply
Message 40 of 116 in Discussion

msg 37 "botttom" ?

OMG where did that extra "t" come from?



mikelapta



Joined: 20/11/2008
Posts: 2186

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:38

Join or Login to Reply
Message 41 of 116 in Discussion

I think "Dee Cyprus " comes to mind



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:42

Join or Login to Reply
Message 42 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 39, dizzycows: As far as I understand the set-up of C44 there's a member database. It must only take seconds to search and find all "lifers".

I think it's more important to have the moderators involved in this thread. I've seen Simbas on line most of the day and No1Doyen in the morning (until I left home to plat chess). Are they waiting to give their opinion? If so, why?



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:44

Join or Login to Reply
Message 43 of 116 in Discussion

Damn! Typo in msg 42: I don't "plat" chess, I try to "play" it...



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:48

Join or Login to Reply
Message 44 of 116 in Discussion

Hans so we have 3 'banned for life' members, You forgot your friend 'Minertor' so by my reckoning that makes 4.

Why do you think they were banned for life?



I have no problem with Minertor coming back as he has been the only one to accept that (despite warnings) he crossed the line and I admire him for accepting that he fell out of line. But you will remember what that was all about I guess.



With regards to Zerochlor he knew exactly why he was banned but maybe he has changed his ways.



With regards to our friend 'John' aka Pike, the guy has no respect for the TRNC, does not live here and despite what anyone else thinks I know for sure that he does not own property in the TRNC.



Oh I guess that leaves our Nige. Which I think is the main reason for you posting this thread.

Unfortunately Nige in all of his re-incarnations has not proven that he can behave himself.

Now I do not moderate on the board I have no concerns either way about any of the 4 that have been banned for life



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:48

Join or Login to Reply
Message 45 of 116 in Discussion

another one DC.. minertor ...



You sure about this plating lark ?



Brinsley


Joined: 04/04/2009
Posts: 6858

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 46 of 116 in Discussion

Minertor is Tony!!!



Richard



Clarissa2


Joined: 12/06/2009
Posts: 1476

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 47 of 116 in Discussion

Re : Msg 43,

"Damn!... "

Manners, manners, Monsieur !



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:52

Join or Login to Reply
Message 48 of 116 in Discussion

And I would like to add that the above posting is my personal opinion only.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 20:54

Join or Login to Reply
Message 49 of 116 in Discussion

Still no moderators comments yet?



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:01

Join or Login to Reply
Message 50 of 116 in Discussion

Oh yes and lets bring back the member that made moderators a requirement in the first place (cannot remember the name but I am sure someone will remind me) Un-banning him will certainly bring the board to life.



Tootie


Joined: 28/08/2008
Posts: 2037

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:02

Join or Login to Reply
Message 51 of 116 in Discussion

The good ole days....

http://www.cyprus44.com/forums/5194.asp



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:02

Join or Login to Reply
Message 52 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 44, AJ: (...) Oh I guess that leaves our Nige. Which I think is the main reason for you posting this thread. (...)

▶ AJ, I think and you know that you'd better not try to lure me into details - the whole correspondence is still available. Let me finish by saying that Nigel Watson showed to be more man than you. Which can be proven, AJ.



@ msg 48, AJ: (...) And I would like to add that the above posting is my personal opinion only. (...)

▶ Since you publicly announced your retirement as a moderator of C44 your addition is meant for very new members only, I suppose.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:08

Join or Login to Reply
Message 53 of 116 in Discussion

D/C how did you get your ban changed?



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:10

Join or Login to Reply
Message 54 of 116 in Discussion

Hans

For your information, despite your 'peace making' exercise I met up with Nige after our last conversation but it appears what we spoke about appeared to fall on deaf ears. You will have to convince the remaining Mods that Nige will behave himself. Good luck!!



Tootie


Joined: 28/08/2008
Posts: 2037

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:17

Join or Login to Reply
Message 55 of 116 in Discussion

AJ Its been obvious for a long time that you and NW was both frauds.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:22

Join or Login to Reply
Message 56 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 54, AJ: (...) For your information, despite your 'peace making' exercise I met up with Nige after our last conversation (...)

▶ I can't comment, because I am not aware of such a meeting. I must believe that the meeting happened - but then it was against the procedure you and I agreed upon. And you broke your word.

Back on topic.



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:31

Join or Login to Reply
Message 57 of 116 in Discussion

Hans

It happened.

The same as nasty text messages to me 'happened'

But let us not divert from what you want to achieve on Cyprus44.

Go for it, convince the Mods and you will control the world, (In jest)



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:34

Join or Login to Reply
Message 58 of 116 in Discussion

WOW



Ive just called david to log in and have a read of this thread,come and have a read mate.



I hope it does not spiral out off topic.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:38

Join or Login to Reply
Message 59 of 116 in Discussion

AJ please stay on topic

personal issues should be addressed via e-mail



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 21:39

Join or Login to Reply
Message 60 of 116 in Discussion

David.



Nice to see your name there again mate.



Be back in the office next week.



Do not work to hard



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:01

Join or Login to Reply
Message 61 of 116 in Discussion

philbailey

Yet another member that does not feel the need to check their e-mail in-box.



sienna


Joined: 09/01/2009
Posts: 1627

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:22

Join or Login to Reply
Message 62 of 116 in Discussion

anyway they have their own playground to play in - why don't you all go and play with them there if you miss them that much



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:24

Join or Login to Reply
Message 63 of 116 in Discussion

Sienna.



David was saying he has not seen you there for a little while



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:25

Join or Login to Reply
Message 64 of 116 in Discussion

Which place is that ?

msg62



rowlo



Joined: 12/10/2008
Posts: 4796

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:30

Join or Login to Reply
Message 65 of 116 in Discussion

if they have been banned for life , they must be anti cyprus 44 ? we all know they come back in various guises , doing the same things , upsetting members , running down everything trnc , but its easy to rumble them , no amnesty .



mmmmmm



Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:31

Join or Login to Reply
Message 66 of 116 in Discussion

re 44 AJ



>>With regards to our friend 'John' aka Pike, the guy has no respect for the TRNC, does not live here and despite what anyone else thinks I know for sure that he does not own property in the TRNC. <<



INCORRECT: The guy DOES have a pad in 'TRNC' ( on pre 74 title )



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 67 of 116 in Discussion

OAii you lot stay on topic ...



AJ stop it or I will ban you ...



you have email...



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 68 of 116 in Discussion

Hey Johnny.



My friend david never ran down the trnc or was uncle cyprus44.



He just got a little excited in his emails to moderators,but that was along time ago.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:33

Join or Login to Reply
Message 69 of 116 in Discussion

msg 65, did Zero run down Cyprus?

or upset members or just an individual?



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 22:37

Join or Login to Reply
Message 70 of 116 in Discussion

PB



He never upset members



he never run down cyprus



He might of had a clash of personalities with harold and AJ,but that was long ago.



He did speak the truth and say it as it was.



Not really sure what straw broke the camels back,it might of been said he was not a fit and proper person to post @ that time.



philbailey


Joined: 17/01/2011
Posts: 3534

Message Posted:
28/06/2011 23:45

Join or Login to Reply
Message 71 of 116 in Discussion

surely a e-mail is what they ask for

to keep it off board



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 08:29

Join or Login to Reply
Message 72 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 62, sienna: (...) why don't you all go and play with them there if you miss them that much (...)

▶ It's not a matter of missing the banned-for-lifers - to be honest I will certainly not start to correspond with some of them (again). That's my choice and prerogative. But at least we all would know to whom we are or are not replying. I think I made that advantage of a general pardon clear in my message 1.

I am pro civilised debate and pro giving (mainly Cyprus) information on this board - I think I prove that time and time again. And if, after a return of the "lifers", messages get personal or nasty (again) I will mail the moderators and ask to delete such messages. In my experience the moderators act this way if they think you're right.

So I don't see any reason why we should not try my proposal, a practical solution, in msg 1.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 08:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 73 of 116 in Discussion

As the originator of this thread: please, stop discussing individual members or "lifers" in this thread - stay on topic and keep replying with your opinion about the petition in msg 1. Thank you.



Tenakoutou



Joined: 27/07/2009
Posts: 4110

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 09:09

Join or Login to Reply
Message 74 of 116 in Discussion

I thoroughly agree with Hans!



For goodness sake, let's let bygones be bygones!



The reason most of the 'banned for life' contributors were banned is because they weren't 'backward in coming forward'!



Imagine 'our favourite Australian bard' content were to be banned, or deleted - how dull life would be!



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 09:35

Join or Login to Reply
Message 75 of 116 in Discussion

Maybe it's against some C44 rule for any moderator to react in this thread? OK. I'll now send the text of message 1 in an email to all of them and will include the URL of this thread also - in case all the moderators missed this thread...



billybob


Joined: 29/03/2008
Posts: 576

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 09:45

Join or Login to Reply
Message 76 of 116 in Discussion

I agree with message 1

Can we include that AJ must also reinstate 'forum admin' and not be covert about the fact he is still able to moderate the board



simbas



Joined: 16/07/2007
Posts: 5943

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 09:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 77 of 116 in Discussion

Msg 75 , there is no such rule Hans , and your plea has not fallen on deaf ears .

Simbas



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:22

Join or Login to Reply
Message 78 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 77, simbas: Thank you for replying, Pat! I was just preparing an email, but I don't think sending it is necessary now.

Awaiting the moderators' decision now (and if possible an explanation in case the decision would be negative).



araneae


Joined: 24/06/2011
Posts: 193

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:32

Join or Login to Reply
Message 79 of 116 in Discussion

It appears all would run smooth, should the banned " for life " brigade were to return since the mod who was behind one if not all the bans in no longer a mod personality conflict removed.



bring back Britvic she broke no published rule .



elko2



Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:38

Join or Login to Reply
Message 80 of 116 in Discussion

Just one question from me: Do leopards ever change their spots?

ismet



magicart


Joined: 05/10/2008
Posts: 985

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:41

Join or Login to Reply
Message 81 of 116 in Discussion

I propose we start another petition to ban more people for life-you know the ones that make personal attacks on other members and their business's.



Art



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:42

Join or Login to Reply
Message 82 of 116 in Discussion

@ one of the moderators: in my opinion all is said in this thread - it maybe best to close the thread.



araneae


Joined: 24/06/2011
Posts: 193

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 10:44

Join or Login to Reply
Message 83 of 116 in Discussion

ismet Were they ever leopards as most are members on other forums and have not been banned on them, so perhaps they were perceived as leopards when in fact they were /are pussy cats.



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:23

Join or Login to Reply
Message 84 of 116 in Discussion

araneae, well said again to unban britvic, the moderators cannot be totally judge and jury on issues they do not understand...



littlenige always has good information as did minertor....



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:26

Join or Login to Reply
Message 85 of 116 in Discussion

billybob

Re message 76:



'Can we include that AJ must also reinstate 'forum admin' and not be covert about the fact he is still able to moderate the board'



Not quite sure what you had for breakfast but cut down on the sugar and/or caffeine.



Statement: I am not a 'moderator' of Cyprus44 and I have no moderating powers. I am a member of this board the same as you.



j200mey


Joined: 06/02/2011
Posts: 81

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:27

Join or Login to Reply
Message 86 of 116 in Discussion

yes bring them all back



mmmmmm



Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:49

Join or Login to Reply
Message 87 of 116 in Discussion

re 81



Magicart



>>I propose we start another petition to ban more people for life-you know the ones that make personal attacks on other members and their business's.

<<



Let's not worry about whether the 'personal attack' was factually correct, eh ?



Certainly glad you aren't a mod....



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:51

Join or Login to Reply
Message 88 of 116 in Discussion

What happend to catalkoykid and dee,did they get life bans?



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 11:55

Join or Login to Reply
Message 89 of 116 in Discussion

0m

Dee asked specifically to be banned for life as she could not resign from membership.



sienna


Joined: 09/01/2009
Posts: 1627

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 12:23

Join or Login to Reply
Message 90 of 116 in Discussion

the boat was rocked it took hard work to get the troublemakers off the boat why let them back on to rock it again.



I feel the forum has got back to some normality apart from a few that come on from time to time making wild statements - never go backwards always move forward



I agree with Ismet .. plus the moderators use thei own time why put them on red alert with the very people that caused so many problems in the past !



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 12:38

Join or Login to Reply
Message 91 of 116 in Discussion

Its how you perceive the problems isn't it, most members have a spat with out resorting to life bans etc.



Most don't have a go at every one, its usually personality clashes that meander out any way after a time..



Most of the banned lifers were very much this forum!!!!



Bring them all back ....



cyprusairsoft



Joined: 22/06/2009
Posts: 2066

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 12:48

Join or Login to Reply
Message 92 of 116 in Discussion

bring em back let them have an on probation logo for 3 months and so other members know they had been banned before



pvt pike was a pain in the arse thats my opinion



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 13:30

Join or Login to Reply
Message 93 of 116 in Discussion

I quite agree with what dizzycows says,some of the arguments were between the same people,personality clashes maybe or each other prodding one an other in the right way to gain a reaction,it still happens now,the board is no different than it was 12 months ago.

Sienna,even boats go backwards.



The board will always have its squabbles,thats part of the debate,every one cannot always agree with each other and you should not ban people who cannot agree with a certain member.



Some get banned for there openess or free speech,or that is how it seems.



Ok the board has rules,we all know rules have been broken in all walks of life.



Izzet. I once knew a man in the UK,he was a drug addict and whilst in jail and going to church he saw the "light" as he puts it,he has never used drugs in the last 10 years and is also a church helper now,CAN A LEOPARD CHANGE ITS SPOTS. i ask you the same question.



erolz


Joined: 17/11/2008
Posts: 3456

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 13:35

Join or Login to Reply
Message 94 of 116 in Discussion

0maintenace ms93 last part.



I think you mean Elko2 / Ismet in the last part of your message above ? Izzet is a different person.



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 13:47

Join or Login to Reply
Message 95 of 116 in Discussion

Thanks. your correct,the sun must be getting to me , i did mean ismet.



blade


Joined: 19/06/2010
Posts: 1286

Message Posted:
29/06/2011 14:09

Join or Login to Reply
Message 96 of 116 in Discussion

AJ message 44.

How do you know for sure Pike doesn't have a house here?

We have been making sure his rental tenant is paying the bills on his house for quite some time.

So i am interested on where you got your info from?? He owns a house here!



elko2



Joined: 24/07/2007
Posts: 4400

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 00:47

Join or Login to Reply
Message 97 of 116 in Discussion

msg. 93

If any member really believes that he/she has really changed his/her spots, why not write to the moderators privately and explain the situation? I am sure the moderators will be very happy to see any evidence of this.

ismet



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 00:54

Join or Login to Reply
Message 98 of 116 in Discussion

Ismet.



Its very possible you have been written too as all of the mods have going back over 1 month so im told,but still no answer as such,only that they are still waiting for replie from 1 mod,seems along time for mods to have to wait for replies from each other!



billybob


Joined: 29/03/2008
Posts: 576

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 09:34

Join or Login to Reply
Message 99 of 116 in Discussion

AJ message 85 what I have had for breakfast is of no concern to you and dont presume to give me advice on it unless I ask for it.

If you have not still got your moderator ability please tell us then how you could go into a closed topic and post an answer almost 15 minutes after is was closed, and i wait with interest your waffle



Troodo


Joined: 12/06/2008
Posts: 1002

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 09:40

Join or Login to Reply
Message 100 of 116 in Discussion

Don't be silly Hans, they come back under a different name the same day.



mmmmmm



Joined: 19/12/2008
Posts: 8398

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 09:41

Join or Login to Reply
Message 101 of 116 in Discussion

Hi Billybob



re 99



>> how you could go into a closed topic and post an answer almost 15 minutes after is was closed<<



It seems that if you are replying to a topic on here and the session hasn't timed out - that even though a mod has closed a thread - it IS possible to post - not knowing the thread WAS closed.... !!



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 09:43

Join or Login to Reply
Message 102 of 116 in Discussion

Well, I only tried to normalise a sick situation on this board, but reading this thread again I admit defeat. At least I tried.



Washerman


Joined: 19/09/2008
Posts: 2301

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 11:04

Join or Login to Reply
Message 103 of 116 in Discussion

"Factually correct" ?

What ! Like - 'don't get Digiturk installed because, some time in the future, if there is a settlement to the Cyprus problem, Digiturk will be illegal in Cyprus and you will have wasted your money' or, 'hey guess what, if your auntie had a pair of test**les, she'd be your uncle'

Pure speculation or, wishful thinking and I'm pleased to say that you have a Masters Degree in it !

On it's own it's 'almost' humour, but add malice and it is 'very' naughty !

Your are just 'very' bitter because you couldn't make a success of the satellite business in Cyprus and ended up back in the UK playing online poker for a living !



AndyR



Joined: 23/04/2009
Posts: 317

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 11:12

Join or Login to Reply
Message 104 of 116 in Discussion

DC, it was a good suggestion but as seems to be the norm on this forum, the thread dissolved into inane off-topic drivel. See msg 103 for a classic example.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 11:38

Join or Login to Reply
Message 105 of 116 in Discussion

@ msg 104, AndyR: What can I say? It's such a pity that potentially such a good medium to communicate (about Northern Cyprus) has declined to a lower level than the worst gutter tabloid.



araneae


Joined: 24/06/2011
Posts: 193

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 11:40

Join or Login to Reply
Message 106 of 116 in Discussion

Hans stand proud you did try.



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 12:36

Join or Login to Reply
Message 107 of 116 in Discussion

Never admit defeat.



AlsancakJack



Joined: 14/08/2008
Posts: 5762

Message Posted:
30/06/2011 17:41

Join or Login to Reply
Message 108 of 116 in Discussion

billybob



RE your message 99:



'AJ message 85 what I have had for breakfast is of no concern to you and dont presume to give me advice on it unless I ask for it.



If you have not still got your moderator ability please tell us then how you could go into a closed topic and post an answer almost 15 minutes after is was closed, and i wait with interest your waffle'



Read 6ms message 101 and tell me what you do not understand about it.

What I posted was fact and it has been known for some time that there is a glitch in Cyprus44 software that allows people to post for maybe 5 minutes after a thread has been closed.



I really do not care about your breakfast but what I do care about is you getting your facts right.

And I re-iterate that I am not a moderator and I have no moderating powers. I would suggest that you print this posting out and read it at breakfast tomorrow after reading your copy of the Sun/Mirror and then apologise.



billybob


Joined: 29/03/2008
Posts: 576

Message Posted:
01/07/2011 00:23

Join or Login to Reply
Message 109 of 116 in Discussion

AJ I personally doubt that you are capable of reading anything other than the Beano or Dandy as most of your rhetoric is rather infantile to put it mildly, your post was made over 10 minutes after the topic was closed, so let me say I do not believe you 'end of'



0maintenance


Joined: 22/09/2010
Posts: 2179

Message Posted:
01/07/2011 08:55

Join or Login to Reply
Message 110 of 116 in Discussion

Billybob.



The other day,simbas closed a thread,whilst the thread was closed i was able to reply to that thread some 2 hours later as when i came home the thread was still open on the page where you would make a reply,so i made a reply and the post went back to the top,what it is your being told is the truth,really,in fact,the post was closed at post 28,but ended up with 34 posts of possibly 35,most being mine after it was closed,i think NO1Doyen then deleted all the posts from 28 onwards.

It is a little glitch in cyp44 program.



I had not realised the thread was closed until after i had posted so many times,with not being so computer savvy i always end up with lots and lots of windows open.



DutchCrusader



Joined: 19/05/2008
Posts: 11281

Message Posted:
01/07/2011 09:13

Join or Login to Reply
Message 111 of 116 in Discussion

BACK ON TOPIC: ▶ [ http://www.cyprus44.com/forums/67362.asp ].



@ msg 110: Threads seem to be closed at once if the moderator closes the thread twice at once.



britvic



Joined: 05/09/2008
Posts: 3039

Message Posted:
20/07/2011 12:44

Join or Login to Reply
Message 112 of 116 in Discussion

I was on holiday when this thread was started and knew nothing about it until now. So it would appear that I have Hans Doleman to thank for my return, I would also like to thank dizzycows who was emailing the Admin team (without my knowledge).

I have heard say on here many times that people who are banned 'wear it like a badge of honour!' Not me I was embarrassed and ashamed, when I went to post the day I was banned and saw in the reply box that I had got an 11 year ban I was physically sick, and thought "Crikey who did I murder?"

All in the past now though, if I was naughty I apologise.



Vicki



britvic



Joined: 05/09/2008
Posts: 3039

Message Posted:
20/07/2011 12:45

Join or Login to Reply
Message 113 of 116 in Discussion

Oh, and Thank you hans (DC) and Dizzycows (DC)



eyebob


Joined: 22/06/2010
Posts: 143

Message Posted:
20/07/2011 17:31

Join or Login to Reply
Message 114 of 116 in Discussion

Thankyou, everyone; reading this thread has reminded again how petty so many people on this forum are. It is akin to reading the Daily Star!!



dizzycows


Joined: 12/05/2009
Posts: 2736

Message Posted:
20/07/2011 17:42

Join or Login to Reply
Message 115 of 116 in Discussion

Oooow shut up Britvic .. lol looks like the two DC s working in harmony, flipping eck.... one for the book eh! lol



Pleased to see you and the others banned members back posting, ..... yippee and hooorah to the moderators xxxxx



Fawkes


Joined: 18/07/2011
Posts: 86

Message Posted:
20/07/2011 18:16

Join or Login to Reply
Message 116 of 116 in Discussion

there is one noticeable absentee , such a shame.



North Cyprus Forums Homepage

Join Cyprus44 Forums | Already a member? Login

You must be a member and logged in, to post replies and new topics.